The death toll of animals that died may be due to one of the deepwater horizon/BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico 50 times higher than currently thought to be a new study in the latest issue of the conservation letters.
Based primarily on the number of recovered carcasses fatality figures have so far. Data on this source and the date of the count depends on the, but the authors to report by November 7, 2010 101 whales, dolphins, and porpoises carcass had on Northern Gulf was recognized by Mexico.
Only 2 percent of the actual animal deaths, according to the study reflect last numbers of the carcasses, the actual number of deaths for whales alone because one might be the spill into the thousands.
PLANET GREEN: Gulf oil spill: amazing and devastating photos
"Our calculations are rough, but are a good starting point, and are much better than under the assumption that the bodies on the beach are the sum of the damage," head writer Rob Williams, told Discovery News.
Williams, has been a member of the University of British Columbia's marine mammal research unit, and colleagues their analysis to 14 whales from the Gulf region. This included sperm whales, killer whales, Atlantic discovered, dolphins, spinner dolphins, and others.
Figure 2 per cent results from the team the last species abundance estimates for these marine mammals with the mortality rate of species multiplied by, and then the mean number of documented were divided by the estimated of annual mortality each year.
"The recovery rate carcass 2 percent of our best estimate of the historic carcass recovery rates, based on the average of the 14 species," Williams said.
Very few remains are due to the decomposition of bodies at sea, predators consume dead individuals and for other reasons, according to the scientists found. As distance from the shore and water remains deep statement also hinder can, the most deepwater disaster victims can be found never. The oil spill instead of 40 miles off the coast and close 5,000 feet of water.
Despite the disturbing images show animals such as birds, die under thick layers of oil after the overflow are there is no evidence to prove that the April 2010 deepwater explosion and spill died of whales as a result.
"How many others, we are waiting for the Necropsies for completeness and the results of peer reviewed and reported," said Williams. "At this point, we can start a discussion about (exactly) how many animals a total of were affected oil spill, and how big these deaths have been relative to the size of the population."
He and his colleagues believe that their calculations are used to marine mammal deaths other human-related causes, to appreciate strikes and interactions with fishing gear such as ship. You can also click past disasters as are applied to the oil Exxon Valdez spill.
Craig Matkin, Director who has North Gulf oceanic society, largely marine mammals affected, that 1989 spill studied. He believes the new study "Welcome and important."
Matkin, told Discovery News, that were found relatively few cetacean, the carcass after the Exxon Valdez event. "Not would have known, that we resident lost 13 killer whales from the large pod in the Prince William sound, we were the deaths of the individual tracking of each whale photo identification not in a position to determine,." he said the he and his team
He added that the fall most of the whales and dolphins to die, and at the end of stranded on the shore.
没有评论:
发表评论